发生了什么
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague. Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny. — Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang , How the Claude Code team does code review Tags: anthropic , claude , ai , claude-code , llms , addy-osmani , coding-agents , generative-ai , agentic-engineering , code-review
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?" Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague. Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny. — Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang , How the Claude Code team does code review Tags: anthropic , claude , ai , claude-code , llms , addy-osmani , coding-agents , generative-ai , agentic-engineering , code-review
为什么重要
需要你自己点开原文确认一次，这里给的是摘要与判断。
需要你自己点开原文确认一次，这里给的是摘要与判断。
跟你有什么关系
暂无明确落点，仅作存档。
暂无明确落点，仅作存档。
以上判断为规则生成的初稿，发布前请润色。
判定理由
评分 0 / 100